| |
The association between disease and human body temperature is as old as medicine
itself. Hippocrates defined fever
in different forms e.g.
malignant, benign, and acute. It
was claimed that if wet mud was
applied to the skin, and one area
dried rapidly while the remainder
was still moist, that an
underlying tumour may be
suspected.
It was not until Gallileo
Gallilei developed his simple
thermoscope in 1595 that attempts
to measure temperature really
began, and some hundred years
later before closed thermometers
and calibrated scales were used.
Carl Wunderlich made the greatest
progress in medicine by his
development of the clinical
thermometer and systematically
recorded the progression of
temperature in a large number of
sick patients in 18711.
His treatise, “On the
Temperature in Disease” carries
a substantial section on
temperature graphs from diseased
patients, some with “Rheumatic
fever”. He argued for the
routine measurement of
temperature and the graphic
record be established for every
patient.
Following the work of Horvath and
Hollander in the late 1940’s2,
temperature measurements were
used as a means of monitoring
intra-articular steroid therapy
by a number of authors. Intra-articular
temperature and isotope clearance
techniques were however,
invasive, unlike the infra red
remote sensing techniques, which
were available from the late 1950’s.
The story of infra red radiation
began in 1800, when Sir William
Herschel, the astronomer,
detected heating rays beyond the
visible red of the spectrum.
After his death in 1840, his son
John Herschel, made the first
thermal image from sunlight using
the evaporograph technique. He
used the term thermogram to
describe the image, which is
still in common use today 3.
Early infra red imaging systems
were developed during the 1940’s
and became available for industry
and medicine first in 1959. The
Pyroscan, (a 1942 instrument) was
first used in Bath in 1959 and
was used to image the increased
heat over arthritic joints.
Picture quality improved with the
Mark 2 instrument, although each
image took 3-4 minutes to
acquire, and were almost
impossible to quantify. Attempts
were made to apply densitometric
measurement to the Mufax paper
print out. A bank of standard
temperature reference sources
were imaged with the subject. The
paper images were unstable, and
unable to reproduce enough grey
tones for temperature estimation.
Later with improved equipment
better dynamic (and objective
images) were obtained which could
usefully supplement radiological
investigation 4.
During the 1960’ and 1970’s a
new generation of thermal imaging
systems were developed in Europe,
the U.S. and Japan. Oscilloscope
displays were introduced, and
electronic isotherms were added
to the image. A bright-line
isotherm which was adjustable for
temperature level was shown on
the monochrome oscilloscope
screen. By multiple exposure
colour photography, the first
colour thermograms were produced
in the 1960’s. At first,
Polaroid photographs of the
isotherms were taken from the
screen and area measuremnts were
manually made by the use of a
planimeter.
Mini-computers for image
processing arrived in the mid to
late 1970’s providing colour
displays, image analysis, and
importantly, data and image
storage. In Bath we installed a
pdp8e computer for image analysis
in 1972, and were able to
calculate a thermal index from
thermograms of patients with
inflammatory arthritis, by
digital image analysis.5
Quantitative thermography opened
up the possibilities for clinical
trials of drug therapy. In the
drive to standardisation for
clinical trial assessment each
stage of the thermographic
investigation was documented.
| The
essential requirements were; |
1. Adequate
preparation of the patients, both
physically and physiologically
2. Use of a suitable examination
room and patient preparation
cubicle
3. standardisation of the ambient
conditions
4. quality assurance checks on
the imaging equipment,
calibration, focus, field of view
etc.
5. Measurement from regions of
interest, and archiving of all
data.
Our
Thermal index, described in 1974
was applied to a number od
controlled clinical studies
involving anti-inflammatory
treatment, Raynaud’s Phenomenon
and Paget’s Disease of Bone.
All the thermal imaging systems
at that time were cooled single
element detector devices, and
speed of scan was inversely
related to spatial and thermal
resolution. The introduction of
the SPRITE detector brought high
speed and high resolution
together. This allowed the use of
dynamic and macro thermography
for clinical medicine.
Modern systems introduced within
the last three years use focal
plane array detectors, with both
high speed images at high thermal
and spatial resolution. Image
quality has dramatically
improved, modern digital
thermograms are now very
different from the crude clinical
images obtained 40 years ago.
Today applications in
rheumatology include the
quantitative study of
inflammation and ant-inflammatory
therapies, peripheral circulatory
disorders related to connective
tissue diseases, and Raynaud’s
phenomenon, sympathetic
disturbances, pain syndromes and
locomotor injuries 6.
Advances in image processing hold
good prospects for improving
standards in image capture and
analysis. Our own software CTHERM
( www.medimaging.org) now
provides masks for each region of
the body. This is part of a
current study to develop an on-line
reference of thermal images from
normal subjects, which currently
is not available to physicans
using thermal imaging.
As hospitals across Europe
progress to all digital records
for their patients, infra red
thermal imaging is virtually
ready for assimilation into the
new systems. The need is for all
practising physicans and clinical
investigators to seriously
embrace the need for good
technique and full
standardisation of the images
recorded 7.
1.
Wunderlich C. 1871 On the temperature in Disease,
A Manual of Medical Thermometry
English translation by W Bathurst Woodman. The
New Sydenham Society, London.
2. Horvath SM. Hollander JL.
1949. Intra-articular temperature as a measure
of joint reaction. Journal of Clinical
Investigation 28. 469-473
3. Ring EFJ. 2000 The Discovery
of Infra Red Radiation in 1800. The Imaging
Science Journal 48. 1-8.
4. Collins AJ, Ring EFJ, Bacon
PA, Brookshaw JD. 1976 Thermography and
Radiology Complimentary Methods for the Study of
Inflammatory Diseases. Clinical Radiology 27,
237- 243.. CRC press London
5. Ring EFJ. 1995 Thermal
Imaging of Skin Temperature in Handbook
of Non- Invasive Methods and the Skin, ed.J
Serup, G Jemec p457-471
6. Will RK, Ring EFJ, Clarke AK,
1992 Maddison PJ. Infrared Thermography: What is
its Place in Rheumatology in the 1990’s? British
Journal of Rheumatology 31. 337-344.
7. Ring EFJ, Ammer K The
Technique of Infra red Imaging in Medicine
Thermology International 10:1 7-14 2000
| |